FacebookTwitter

HAI

Unless otherwise indicated, the material below has not been prepared by Van Eck Associates Corporation or HardAssetsInvestor.com.
Neither assumes any liability for any content on a third party website or material prepared by a third party.

Brad's Desktop

   |
Poor Nothing special Worth watching Pretty cool Awesome! 13 Ratings
Rate this article
Two Weeks And I’m Not Rich Yet!
Written by Brad Zigler   
March 02, 2010 12:32 pm EST
Real-time Monetary Inflation (last 12 months): 2.1%

I'm so disappointed in Colin McCabe. You remember McCabe, don't you? He's the supposed editor of the ubiquitous Elite Stock Report we wrote about in "A Golden Future In Your Mailbox."

Two weeks ago, I received McCabe's missive promising "monster gains inside the next 60 days" on Guinness Exploration Inc. (OTCBB: GNXP). Then (Feb. 16, to be exact), the Canadian development company's stock traded for $1.28 a share. Monday, it closed at $1.09, down 14.8 percent.

One of the helpfully yellow-highlighted paragraphs in McCabe's 12-page report blared: "we've got a window of a few days in which we can buy shares in Guinness Exploration ‘in stealth mode' without Wall Street knowing about it."

Apparently, I missed the window. I got McCabe's letter just as Guinness Exploration peaked after a run from 85 cents in which daily trading ultimately increased sixfold. Volume's now fallen below pre-rally levels along with the stock's price.

Still, Guinness Exploration's price trajectory is only mirroring, to an exaggerated degree, the trend in the junior gold mining sector as a whole. Since Feb. 16, the Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: GDXJ) has slipped 1.3 percent. Senior issues proxied by the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: GDX), meanwhile, fell 0.6 percent.

 

Junior Gold Stocks (GDXJ) Vs. Majors (GDX)

Junior Gold Stocks (GDXJ) Vs. Majors (GDX)

 

Short-term technicals have improved for the junior sector since last week, but the overhanging weight of a sluggish gold market is still keeping a lid on prices. GDXJ has yet to retrace 50 percent of its decline from an interim peak in January.

There's a bid under $24 propping up the ETF, but there's resistance at the $25 level, about where the fund's 200-day moving average rests.

Of course, those gold issues don't have the drumbeat of the Elite Stock Report motivating buyers.

Given the comparative performance over the past week, maybe that's not such a bad thing.



 

 
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter 
First Comment

Comments (0)



Post a Comment

Comment
(Limit 2,000
characters) 
*
Name: *
E-mail: *
Home page:

(optional)

Type in the displayed characters
Email follow-up comments to my e-mail address
 


Terms of Use
The HardAssetsInvestor.com message board and comment features are designed to facilitate thoughtful discussion of the biggest issues impacting commodity investors. All comments should be respectful. Insults and profanity are not permitted. The editor reserves the right to remove comments at his/her discretion.

 

Related Articles »

Did you like this article? Then you may be interested in:

 

Commodities Data

September 07, 2010 08:54 PM EST

  Loading data ...
 

Weekly Commodities Poll

Do you think futures-based ETFs have a significant effect on commodities prices?

 

Related Articles »

Did you like this article? Then you may be interested in:

 

Seminal Papers »